Agent Skillskarlomikus/bar-assistant › clean-ddd-hexagonal

clean-ddd-hexagonal

GitHub

提供DDD、整洁架构与六边形架构的后端设计指导,涵盖分层依赖规则、代码组织决策树及领域模型构建,适用于复杂业务系统的可维护性开发。

.agents/skills/clean-ddd-hexagonal/SKILL.md karlomikus/bar-assistant

Trigger Scenarios

设计微服务或后端API结构 应用DDD战术模式(实体、值对象、聚合根) 实现整洁架构分层与端口适配器模式 处理领域事件或CQRS架构

Install

npx skills add karlomikus/bar-assistant --skill clean-ddd-hexagonal -g -y
More Options

Non-standard path

npx skills add https://github.com/karlomikus/bar-assistant/tree/develop/.agents/skills/clean-ddd-hexagonal -g -y

Use without installing

npx skills use karlomikus/bar-assistant@clean-ddd-hexagonal

指定 Agent (Claude Code)

npx skills add karlomikus/bar-assistant --skill clean-ddd-hexagonal -a claude-code -g -y

安装 repo 全部 skill

npx skills add karlomikus/bar-assistant --all -g -y

预览 repo 内 skill

npx skills add karlomikus/bar-assistant --list

SKILL.md

Frontmatter
{
    "name": "clean-ddd-hexagonal",
    "description": "Proactively apply when designing APIs, microservices, or scalable backend structure. Triggers on DDD, Clean Architecture, Hexagonal, ports and adapters, entities, value objects, domain events, CQRS, event sourcing, repository pattern, use cases, onion architecture, outbox pattern, aggregate root, anti-corruption layer. Use when working with domain models, aggregates, repositories, or bounded contexts. Clean Architecture + DDD + Hexagonal patterns for backend services, language-agnostic (Go, Rust, Python, TypeScript, Java, C#)."
}

Clean Architecture + DDD + Hexagonal

Backend architecture combining DDD tactical patterns, Clean Architecture dependency rules, and Hexagonal ports/adapters for maintainable, testable systems.

When to Use (and When NOT to)

Use When Skip When
Complex business domain with many rules Simple CRUD, few business rules
Long-lived system (years of maintenance) Prototype, MVP, throwaway code
Team of 5+ developers Solo developer or small team (1-2)
Multiple entry points (API, CLI, events) Single entry point, simple API
Need to swap infrastructure (DB, broker) Fixed infrastructure, unlikely to change
High test coverage required Quick scripts, internal tools

Start simple. Evolve complexity only when needed. Most systems don't need full CQRS or Event Sourcing.

CRITICAL: The Dependency Rule

Dependencies point inward only. Outer layers depend on inner layers, never the reverse.

Infrastructure → Application → Domain
   (adapters)     (use cases)    (core)

Violations to catch:

  • Domain importing database/HTTP libraries
  • Controllers calling repositories directly (bypassing use cases)
  • Entities depending on application services

Design validation: "Create your application to work without either a UI or a database" — Alistair Cockburn. If you can run your domain logic from tests with no infrastructure, your boundaries are correct.

Quick Decision Trees

"Where does this code go?"

Where does it go?
├─ Pure business logic, no I/O           → domain/
├─ Orchestrates domain + has side effects → application/
├─ Talks to external systems              → infrastructure/
├─ Defines HOW to interact (interface)    → port (domain or application)
└─ Implements a port                      → adapter (infrastructure)

"Is this an Entity or Value Object?"

Entity or Value Object?
├─ Has unique identity that persists → Entity
├─ Defined only by its attributes    → Value Object
├─ "Is this THE same thing?"         → Entity (identity comparison)
└─ "Does this have the same value?"  → Value Object (structural equality)

"Should this be its own Aggregate?"

Aggregate boundaries?
├─ Must be consistent together in a transaction → Same aggregate
├─ Can be eventually consistent                 → Separate aggregates
├─ Referenced by ID only                        → Separate aggregates
└─ >10 entities in aggregate                    → Split it

Rule: One aggregate per transaction. Cross-aggregate consistency via domain events (eventual consistency).

Directory Structure

src/
├── domain/                    # Core business logic (NO external dependencies)
│   ├── {aggregate}/
│   │   ├── entity              # Aggregate root + child entities
│   │   ├── value_objects       # Immutable value types
│   │   ├── events              # Domain events
│   │   ├── repository          # Repository interface (DRIVEN PORT)
│   │   └── services            # Domain services (stateless logic)
│   └── shared/
│       └── errors              # Domain errors
├── application/               # Use cases / Application services
│   ├── {use-case}/
│   │   ├── command             # Command/Query DTOs
│   │   ├── handler             # Use case implementation
│   │   └── port                # Driver port interface
│   └── shared/
│       └── unit_of_work        # Transaction abstraction
├── infrastructure/            # Adapters (external concerns)
│   ├── persistence/           # Database adapters
│   ├── messaging/             # Message broker adapters
│   ├── http/                  # REST/GraphQL adapters (DRIVER)
│   └── config/
│       └── di                  # Dependency injection / composition root
└── main                        # Bootstrap / entry point

DDD Building Blocks

Pattern Purpose Layer Key Rule
Entity Identity + behavior Domain Equality by ID
Value Object Immutable data Domain Equality by value, no setters
Aggregate Consistency boundary Domain Only root is referenced externally
Domain Event Record of change Domain Past tense naming (OrderPlaced)
Repository Persistence abstraction Domain (port) Per aggregate, not per table
Domain Service Stateless logic Domain When logic doesn't fit an entity
Application Service Orchestration Application Coordinates domain + infra

Anti-Patterns (CRITICAL)

Anti-Pattern Problem Fix
Anemic Domain Model Entities are data bags, logic in services Move behavior INTO entities
Repository per Entity Breaks aggregate boundaries One repository per AGGREGATE
Leaking Infrastructure Domain imports DB/HTTP libs Domain has ZERO external deps
God Aggregate Too many entities, slow transactions Split into smaller aggregates
Skipping Ports Controllers → Repositories directly Always go through application layer
CRUD Thinking Modeling data, not behavior Model business operations
Premature CQRS Adding complexity before needed Start with simple read/write, evolve
Cross-Aggregate TX Multiple aggregates in one transaction Use domain events for consistency

Implementation Order

  1. Discover the Domain — Event Storming, conversations with domain experts
  2. Model the Domain — Entities, value objects, aggregates (no infra)
  3. Define Ports — Repository interfaces, external service interfaces
  4. Implement Use Cases — Application services coordinating domain
  5. Add Adapters last — HTTP, database, messaging implementations

DDD is collaborative. Modeling sessions with domain experts are as important as the code patterns.

Reference Documentation

File Purpose
references/LAYERS.md Complete layer specifications
references/DDD-STRATEGIC.md Bounded contexts, context mapping
references/DDD-TACTICAL.md Entities, value objects, aggregates (pseudocode)
references/HEXAGONAL.md Ports, adapters, naming
references/CQRS-EVENTS.md Command/query separation, events
references/TESTING.md Unit, integration, architecture tests
references/CHEATSHEET.md Quick decision guide

Sources

Primary Sources

Pattern References

Implementation Guides

Version History

  • 49eb084 Current 2026-08-20 15:52

Same Skill Collection

.agents/skills/bar-assistant-application-service/SKILL.md
.agents/skills/ubiquitous-language/SKILL.md

Metadata

Files
0
Version
e88a5ea
Hash
06225eec
Indexed
2026-08-20 15:52

Accueil - Wiki
Copyright © 2011-2026 iteam. Current version is 2.155.2. UTC+08:00, 2026-08-30 04:34
浙ICP备14020137号-1 $Carte des visiteurs$