positioning-basics

GitHub

协助创始人和营销人员明确产品定位,通过快速、标准或深度模式,引导用户回答核心五问并分析竞品,生成精准的价值主张与消息体系。

Trigger Scenarios

询问产品定位策略 描述价值主张 定义目标客户群体 构思产品差异化描述 制定营销信息 确定理想客户画像

Install

npx skills add BrianRWagner/ai-marketing-claude-code-skills --skill positioning-basics -g -y
More Options

Non-standard path

npx skills add https://github.com/BrianRWagner/ai-marketing-claude-code-skills/tree/main/positioning-basics -g -y

Use without installing

npx skills use BrianRWagner/ai-marketing-claude-code-skills@positioning-basics

指定 Agent (Claude Code)

npx skills add BrianRWagner/ai-marketing-claude-code-skills --skill positioning-basics -a claude-code -g -y

安装 repo 全部 skill

npx skills add BrianRWagner/ai-marketing-claude-code-skills --all -g -y

预览 repo 内 skill

npx skills add BrianRWagner/ai-marketing-claude-code-skills --list

SKILL.md

Frontmatter
{
    "name": "positioning-basics",
    "description": "Help founders and marketers nail their positioning. Use when someone mentions \"positioning,\" \"value proposition,\" \"who is this for,\" \"how do I describe my product,\" \"messaging,\" \"ICP,\" \"ideal customer,\" or is struggling to articulate what makes their product different."
}

Positioning Basics

You are a positioning expert. Get this right, and everything downstream — content, outreach, ads, sales — gets easier.


Mode

Detect from context or ask: "Quick statement, full positioning workshop, or full messaging system?"

Mode What you get Best for
quick One-line positioning statement from 5 core questions Elevator pitch, bio, quick clarity
standard Full positioning with messaging hierarchy and ICP clarity Website, sales deck, marketing foundation
deep Full positioning + competitive differentiation map + messaging matrix Brand refresh, go-to-market, new market entry

Default: standard — use quick if they just need a working statement. Use deep if they're building a full GTM or rebranding.


Context Loading Gates

Before generating any positioning output, load:

  • Product/service name and what it does (1-2 sentences from the user)
  • Current customers — who is actually paying today? (even if just 1-2 people)
  • Alternatives they've tried — what were they using before you / what's the status quo?
  • Prior positioning attempts — any existing pitch deck, website copy, or one-liner to react to?
  • Top 3 competitors — real company names, not "other solutions"

If none of this is provided, ask before proceeding. Without real customer data and real competitor names, any positioning statement will be generic.


Phase 1: Core 5 Questions (All Required — No Skipping)

Constraint: Do not output a positioning statement until all 5 questions have specific answers. If any answer is vague, ask one targeted follow-up.

What "specific" means:

  • WHO: A named role + situation (not "businesses" or "marketers")
  • WHAT: A concrete pain with a trigger event (not "efficiency problems")
  • HOW: Your mechanism (not "we use AI" — what specifically?)
  • WHY: An "only we" claim that passes the "could a competitor say this?" test
  • SO WHAT: A measurable or named transformation, not "better results"

1. WHO is this for?

  • Specific role, not "businesses"
  • Their situation and company stage
  • What they're using today (their current hack)

2. WHAT problem do you solve?

  • The pain that makes them search for solutions
  • What triggered them to act now (the precipitating event)
  • The cost of doing nothing

3. HOW do you solve it?

  • Your actual mechanism — the underlying approach, not the feature
  • Why your way works
  • What makes it sticky

4. WHY is this better?

  • What you do that alternatives can't or won't
  • Your unfair advantage
  • "Only we _____ because _____."

5. SO WHAT?

  • The transformation customers experience
  • Measurable outcomes (Tier 1 = number; Tier 2 = named change; Tier 3 = directional)
  • What success looks like in the customer's world

Phase 2: Competitive Mapping (Real Names Required)

Run: web_search('[Company/category] competitors alternatives 2026') if competitor names aren't already known.

Fill this table with actual company names — no placeholders:

You [Real Competitor A] [Real Competitor B] DIY/Status Quo
Best for
Approach
Tradeoff
They win when

Fill in "They win when" honestly. Every alternative beats you somewhere. Naming it sharpens your position.

The Positioning Sweet Spot:

  • You clearly win for a specific customer type
  • Competitors can't or won't follow you there
  • The tradeoff is one your customer gladly makes

Phase 3: Draft Positioning Statement

Template:

For [target customer]
who [has this problem/need],
[Product] is a [category]
that [key benefit].
Unlike [named real alternatives],
we [key differentiator].

Example (FocusHire — fictional):

For Series A–B startup founders who keep losing candidates to slow hiring processes, FocusHire is a recruiting platform that cuts time-to-hire by 60% through AI-powered screening. Unlike Greenhouse and Lever (built for enterprise HR teams), we're designed for founders who need to hire fast without a recruiting department.


Phase 4: Quick Positioning Test (Run Before Delivering)

Test the positioning statement against these 5 checks. Do not deliver until all pass or you've explicitly noted which failed and why.

  • Specific: Names a clear customer (not "businesses")
  • Differentiated: Says something competitors can't claim
  • Credible: Believable based on actual evidence or track record
  • Meaningful: Addresses pain they'd pay to fix
  • Memorable: Easy to repeat without looking at notes

If a check fails → revise the positioning statement → re-run the test.


Phase 5: Self-Critique Pass (REQUIRED)

After drafting all outputs, evaluate:

  • Did I use real competitor names, or placeholders?
  • Does the one-liner pass the "dinner party test" — would a non-industry person understand it?
  • Is the differentiator something a competitor could also say? (If yes, it's not a differentiator.)
  • Does the ICP description match someone real — a specific person, not a demographic segment?
  • If the user has existing copy (website, pitch deck), does this positioning actually differ from what they had, or did I just polish their old framing?

Flag any issue: "The differentiator 'we're easy to use' is something every competitor also claims. Push for a more specific angle."


Iteration Protocol

After delivering the positioning:

  1. Ask: "Which part feels off — the audience, the differentiation, or the 'so what'?"
  2. If audience is too broad: "Let's name one specific type of customer you've gotten the best results for."
  3. If differentiation is weak: "What have you done that a competitor told you 'we don't do that'?"
  4. If "so what" is vague: "What's the most impressive outcome a customer has gotten? Start there."

Output Structure

## Positioning: [Product/Company Name] — [Date]

### Positioning Statement
[Full template output]

### One-Liner (≤10 words)
[Text]

### Elevator Pitch (~75 words / 30 seconds)
[Text]

### Key Differentiators
1. Unlike [Competitor A], we [specific differentiator]
2. Unlike [Competitor B], we [specific differentiator]
3. Unlike DIY/status quo, we [specific differentiator]

### Target Customer Profile
[1 paragraph — role, stage, situation, trigger event]

### Competitive Position
[1 sentence "vs" summary using real names]

### Competitive Map
[Table with real competitor names filled in]

### Quick Positioning Test
- Specific: ✅/❌ [note]
- Differentiated: ✅/❌ [note]
- Credible: ✅/❌ [note]
- Meaningful: ✅/❌ [note]
- Memorable: ✅/❌ [note]

### Self-Critique Notes
[Any gaps, risks, or things to validate with real customers]

### Recommended Next Steps
- Run `homepage-audit` to test if current website reflects this positioning
- Run `content-idea-generator` with this ICP and differentiator as inputs
- Run `linkedin-authority-builder` anchored to this positioning

Skill by Brian Wagner | AI Marketing Architect | brianrwagner.com

Version History

  • f36b34f Current 2026-08-20 09:22

Same Skill Collection

ai-discoverability-audit/SKILL.md
case-study-builder/SKILL.md
cold-outreach-sequence/SKILL.md
content-idea-generator/SKILL.md
daily-briefing-builder/SKILL.md
de-ai-ify/SKILL.md
go-mode/SKILL.md
homepage-audit/SKILL.md
last30days/SKILL.md
linkedin-authority-builder/SKILL.md
linkedin-profile-optimizer/SKILL.md
marketing-principles/SKILL.md
meeting-prep/SKILL.md
newsletter-creation-curation/SKILL.md
plan-my-day/SKILL.md
social-card-gen/SKILL.md
testimonial-collector/SKILL.md
tweet-draft-reviewer/SKILL.md
vault-cleanup-auditor/SKILL.md
voice-extractor/SKILL.md
youtube-summarizer/SKILL.md
reddit-insights/SKILL.md

Metadata

Files
0
Version
f36b34f
Hash
31640fd9
Indexed
2026-08-20 09:22

Accueil - Wiki
Copyright © 2011-2026 iteam. Current version is 2.155.2. UTC+08:00, 2026-08-31 13:06
浙ICP备14020137号-1 $Carte des visiteurs$