compare-tasks
GitHub对比两个Harbor评估运行在单一任务上的表现差异,通过脚本定位试验目录并提取奖励、耗时、成本及错误类型等关键指标,深入分析结果不同的原因。
Trigger Scenarios
Install
npx skills add aaif-goose/goose --skill compare-tasks -g -y
SKILL.md
Frontmatter
{
"name": "compare-tasks",
"description": "Compare how two harbor benchmark runs performed on a single shared task"
}
Compare two harbor runs on one task
Use when given two harbor run names and a task name, and the goal is to understand why the two runs differ on that task — not just that they differ.
Inputs
RUN_A: harbor run name (e.g.sonnet46-full)RUN_B: harbor run name (e.g.pi-sonnet46-full)TASK: bare task name (e.g.extract-elf, notterminal-bench/extract-elf)RUNS_DIR: defaults toevals/harbor/runs/relative to the repo root
Procedure
1. Find each run's trial directory for the task
Harbor 0.8 names trial dirs <task>__<random-suffix> (e.g.
extract-elf__bU3GHs4), not <task>.1. The suffix is unique per trial,
so don't guess it — discover it from disk:
TRIAL_A_DIR=$(ls -d "$RUNS_DIR/$RUN_A/${TASK}__"*/ 2>/dev/null | head -1)
TRIAL_B_DIR=$(ls -d "$RUNS_DIR/$RUN_B/${TASK}__"*/ 2>/dev/null | head -1)
If either is empty, that run didn't include this task — stop and say so.
(ls "$RUNS_DIR/$RUN_A/" shows what's there.)
If you want to confirm the match, every result.json carries task_name
and trial_name:
jq '{task_name, trial_name}' "$TRIAL_A_DIR/result.json"
2. Headline facts
The fastest path is to let cmd.py task do it for you — it already prints
status, reward, duration, tokens, turns, cost, error class, and the tail of
the verifier stdout:
./evals/harbor/cmd.py task "$RUN_A" "$TASK"
./evals/harbor/cmd.py task "$RUN_B" "$TASK"
Only drop to raw jq against result.json if you need a field cmd.py task
doesn't print. The actual shape (harbor 0.8 TrialResult):
jq '{
reward: (.verifier_result.rewards.reward
// (.verifier_result.rewards | to_entries | .[0].value)
// null),
rewards_all: .verifier_result.rewards,
duration_seconds: ((.finished_at | fromdateiso8601) - (.started_at | fromdateiso8601)),
input_tokens: .agent_result.n_input_tokens,
cache_tokens: .agent_result.n_cache_tokens,
output_tokens: .agent_result.n_output_tokens,
cost_usd: .agent_result.cost_usd,
error_type: .exception_info.exception_type,
error_message: (.exception_info.exception_message // "" | split("\n")[0])
}' "$TRIAL_A_DIR/result.json"
The reward fallback mirrors reporter.trial_reward: if the verifier
didn't use the conventional reward key, take the first value in the
rewards map.
Derive status from those:
passifreward >= 1.0partialifreward > 0(and < 1)failifreward == 0timeoutif reward is 0/null anderror_typecontains "timeout"errorif reward is 0/null anderror_typeis set (non-timeout)no-rewardif neitherverifier_result.rewardsnorexception_infois set
Reward wins over errors: harbor can record an AgentTimeoutError after the
verifier already scored a pass (the agent finished the work then the harness
timed out during teardown, or it timed out after writing the correct answer).
If we got points, count them. See reporter.trial_status for the canonical
rule.
Several agent_result fields can be null depending on the harness
(notably n_cache_tokens, n_output_tokens, cost_usd on some goose
runs). Don't treat that as a failure — just omit those facts from the
comparison if missing on either side. cmd.py task already applies
harbor's fallbacks (reading goose's complete event from agent/goose.txt
when the structured field is null), so its numbers are the right ones to
report.
3. Read the task spec
The task definitions are NOT in the harbor Python package. They are plain
text files on disk, in harbor's task cache. Do not run find / or
pip show harbor — that is the wrong direction.
Harbor caches under ~/.cache/harbor/ on every platform (it uses
Path("~/.cache/harbor").expanduser() unconditionally — there is no
~/Library/Caches/harbor on macOS, despite what you might expect).
The on-disk layout for package-backed tasks (the common case — everything
in terminal-bench/terminal-bench-2 lands here) is:
~/.cache/harbor/tasks/packages/<org>/<task>/<digest>/
Note: no dataset name in the path. Tasks are keyed by org + task name +
content digest, not by which dataset pulled them. The <digest> segment
changes when the task is republished, so discover the dir rather than
hardcoding:
TASK_DIR=$(ls -d ~/.cache/harbor/tasks/packages/terminal-bench/"$TASK"/*/ 2>/dev/null | head -1)
echo "$TASK_DIR"
ls "$TASK_DIR"
If that's empty, the task could be from a different org or a git source —
broaden the search. find returns the parent (one level above the
digest), so descend one more level. Guard against $PARENT being empty,
otherwise the glob expands to /*/ and matches the filesystem root:
PARENT=$(find ~/.cache/harbor/tasks -type d -name "$TASK" 2>/dev/null | head -1)
if [ -n "$PARENT" ]; then
TASK_DIR=$(ls -d "$PARENT"/*/ 2>/dev/null | head -1)
fi
If both lookups come up empty, the task hasn't been downloaded on this
machine — bail out and report that, rather than guessing. (Runs sync via
cmd.py pull but the task cache does not, so a machine that only inspects
results may never have the spec locally.)
~/.cache/harbor/datasets/ exists too but holds dataset-level metadata,
not the per-task instruction.md / tests/ / solution/ files — not
what you want here.
Inside, you care about three files:
instruction.md— exactly what the agent was asked to dotests/test_outputs.py(or sometimesrun-tests.sh) — what the verifier actually checks, line by linesolution/solution.sh— the reference correct answer
Without all three you can't tell whether a wrong answer was a misread, a shallow bug, or a verifier surprise. Quote the assertion that failed when you describe a failure — paraphrasing is how wrong conclusions sneak in.
4. Read each agent's trajectory
Two sources, prefer the first when present:
$TRIAL_DIR/agent/trajectory.json— harbor's ATIF format, one entry per agent step.jq '.steps[] | {step_id, source, message, tool_calls: [.tool_calls[]?.function_name]}'gives a compact view. Most current runs have it; some older harness versions may not.$TRIAL_DIR/agent/<harness>.txt— raw stream-json or log. The filename matches the harness (commonlygoose.txtorpi.txt; other harnesses use their own name). Don't guess — runls "$TRIAL_DIR/agent/"and use whatever.txtfile is there.
Skim, don't quote in full. For each agent identify:
- the approach it took (e.g. "wrote a Python script that walks the ELF section headers")
- the final artifacts it left in the container (file paths it created or modified)
- for losers, the failure mode — one of:
- misread the spec (wrong assumption about input/output)
- right approach, shallow bug (off-by-one, wrong encoding, wrong base address)
- ran out of clock (timeout) — note whether it was still making progress or had gone in circles
- diverged into an unproductive thread (e.g. debugging a non-issue)
- the verifier expected something the spec didn't telegraph
5. Read the verifier output
$TRIAL_DIR/verifier/ typically contains:
test-stdout.txt— the verifier's full stdout (assertion failures, pytest output, etc.). This is usually the most diagnostic file.reward.txt— the scalar reward as a string.ctrf.json— structured test results in CTRF format, useful if you want per-assertion pass/fail without grepping stdout.
tail -50 "$TRIAL_DIR/verifier/test-stdout.txt"
This is often more diagnostic than the agent log — it tells you exactly which assertion failed and what the agent's output was at that point.
6. Produce the comparison
Output markdown with these sections in order:
- Headline (1 line): who won, by how much (reward + cost / duration if meaningful, omitting fields that are null on either side).
- What A did (2-4 sentences): plan, final artifact, verifier outcome.
- What B did (2-4 sentences): same shape as A.
- Why outcomes differ (2-4 sentences): the actual mechanism. Not "B was
smarter" but "B's script used
nm -nso its addresses matched the verifier's ground truth, A's script used PIE-relocated virtual addresses which the verifier doesn't normalize". - Generalizable lesson (optional, 1-2 sentences): is this a pattern that probably affects other tasks, or a one-off accident of this verifier? Skip if unclear from one task.
Tools you'll need
./evals/harbor/cmd.py task <run> <task>for the headline numbersls -dto discover the<task>__<suffix>trial directoriesjqfor anyresult.jsonfieldcmd.py taskdoesn't print- file reads against
$TRIAL_DIR/agent/and$TRIAL_DIR/verifier/ find ~/.cache/harbor/tasksto locate the task spec
No Python imports, no harbor package required. Everything you need is on
disk as JSON / text files.
Version History
- 9e4ac72 Current 2026-08-20 08:01


