Agent Skillsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills › ieee-transactions-on-power-electronics

ieee-transactions-on-power-electronics

GitHub

用于评估电力电子稿件是否符合IEEE TPEL期刊要求,提供范围匹配、硬件验证标准及拒稿启发式分析。

Engineering-Technology-Journal-Skills/skills/ieee-transactions-on-power-electronics/SKILL.md brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

Trigger Scenarios

作者投稿TPEL需进行适配性检查 在TPEL与TIE或其他期刊间做选择 需要将设计重构为具有可测量效益的贡献

Install

npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ieee-transactions-on-power-electronics -g -y
More Options

Non-standard path

npx skills add https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Engineering-Technology-Journal-Skills/skills/ieee-transactions-on-power-electronics -g -y

Use without installing

npx skills use brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills@ieee-transactions-on-power-electronics

指定 Agent (Claude Code)

npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ieee-transactions-on-power-electronics -a claude-code -g -y

安装 repo 全部 skill

npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --all -g -y

预览 repo 内 skill

npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --list

SKILL.md

Frontmatter
{
    "name": "ieee-transactions-on-power-electronics",
    "description": "Use when targeting IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics (TPEL) or deciding whether a power-conversion manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the hardware-validation bar, the converter-and-control scope, the TPEL-vs-TIE routing, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics."
}

IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics (ieee-transactions-on-power-electronics)

Journal positioning

IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics (TPEL) is the leading archival venue for power conversion: converter and inverter topologies, motor drives, control of power-electronic systems, magnetics and passive components, wide-bandgap devices in circuits, and power-electronics-enabled energy systems. The defining expectation is a concrete power-conversion advance backed by experimental validation — a topology, modulation, or control method whose benefit (efficiency, power density, reliability, dynamic response) is demonstrated on hardware, not only in simulation. Simulation-only proposals and minor topology permutations without measured benefit are a weak fit. This skill is a fit / venue-selection / re-framing tool. It does not replace the journal's current official author guidelines. Before submitting, re-check the live IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics author information and submission system.

When to trigger

  • The author names TPEL for a converter, inverter, drive, or power-electronic-control manuscript and wants a fit/framing check.
  • A design must be re-framed from "we built a converter" into a generalizable power-conversion contribution with measured, benchmarked benefit.
  • The author is choosing between TPEL and ieee-transactions-on-industrial-electronics (broader industrial electronics) or an energy-systems venue.
  • The author needs the hardware-validation bar and desk-reject heuristics specific to power electronics.

Scope & topic fit

  • Converter and inverter topologies: DC-DC, DC-AC, AC-DC, multilevel, resonant, and soft-switching converters with a clear conversion advantage.
  • Modulation and control of power-electronic systems: current/voltage control, model predictive control, stability of grid-tied and standalone converters.
  • Motor drives and electric-machine control from the power-electronics side: drive topologies, modulation, and torque/efficiency performance.
  • Wide-bandgap (SiC/GaN) device application in converters, gate drives, packaging, and thermal management with measured impact.
  • Magnetics, passive components, EMI, and reliability of power-electronic converters; power-electronics interfaces for renewables, storage, and transportation.

Method & evidence bar

  • The contribution is a power-conversion method with experimental validation — a hardware prototype with measured efficiency, power density, thermal, dynamic, or reliability results, typically expected at this venue.
  • Simulation establishes design and operating principles but generally does not substitute for measurement; the absence of any hardware result is a common weakness.
  • Efficiency and performance must be benchmarked against the relevant state-of-the-art topology/control under comparable conditions, with operating points and loss breakdowns reported.
  • Claims (e.g., higher efficiency, lower EMI, better dynamics) must be supported by instrumented measurements with stated test conditions, component ratings, and control parameters.
  • The contribution must generalize beyond one built unit: the design principle, trade-offs, and applicable operating range should be made explicit.

Structure & house style

  • IEEE format; TPEL publishes full Papers and shorter Letters — match scope to the article type and re-check current definitions and limits on the live guide.
  • The introduction motivates the conversion problem and positions against prior topologies/control; the analysis derives the operating principle before the experiment validates it.
  • Figures are central and quantitative: schematics, modulation/control diagrams, measured waveforms, efficiency/loss curves, thermal images, and prototype photos.
  • Hardware specifications (devices, magnetics, switching frequency, power level) must be reported in enough detail to reproduce the result.

Official-submission checklist

  • Before giving submission-ready advice, read ../../resources/source-basis.md and ../../resources/official-source-map.md; start from the IEEE Author Center anchors, then cite the current Transactions on Power Electronics page you checked.
  • Search the live site for "IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics information for authors" and follow the current submission-system version.
  • Re-check article types (Paper vs. Letter), length/overlength policy, and the IEEE template.
  • Confirm expectations for experimental validation, measured-data reporting, and any reproducibility requirements.
  • Re-check ORCID, competing-interests, funding, author-contribution, and AI-use disclosure requirements, and IEEE open-access options.
  • If the live official instructions conflict with this skill, the official instructions win.

Pre-submission self-check

  • The contribution is a generalizable power-conversion advance, not a one-off build or a minor topology permutation.
  • A hardware prototype provides measured efficiency/dynamic/thermal/reliability results, not simulation only.
  • Performance is benchmarked against the relevant state-of-the-art topology/control under comparable conditions.
  • Loss breakdowns, operating points, and test conditions are reported.
  • Component ratings, switching frequency, and control parameters are detailed enough to reproduce.
  • Article type (Paper vs. Letter) and length fit current limits.

Common desk-reject triggers

  • Simulation-only converter/control proposal with no experimental validation.
  • A minor topology permutation with no measured efficiency/performance benefit over existing designs.
  • Efficiency claims with no loss breakdown, no benchmark, or under non-comparable test conditions.
  • Results from a single built unit with no generalizable design principle or trade-off analysis.
  • Application/integration paper where power electronics is incidental and no converter-level advance is shown.

Re-routing decision

  • Broader industrial-electronics, drives, or industrial-systems emphasis → ieee-transactions-on-industrial-electronics.
  • Grid/system-level integration rather than the converter → ieee-transactions-on-power-systems.
  • Energy-system performance is the primary narrative → applied-energy.
  • Battery/storage-cell or device materials focus → journal-of-power-sources / energy-storage-materials.
  • Broad tutorial/survey of a power-electronics area → proceedings-of-the-ieee.

Output format

[Fit] High / Medium / Low (one-line reason)
[Target] IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics
[Topic tags] <2–3 closest power-electronics subtopics>
[Conversion advance] <the topology/control idea and the metric it improves>
[Hardware validation] <prototype + measured results present? benchmarked?>
[Top risk] <the single most likely reason for rejection>
[Article type] Paper / Letter
[Official items to re-check] <article type / length / experimental-validation / disclosures>
[Re-route suggestion] <if not a fit, a better-matched venue>

Version History

  • 1839142 Current 2026-07-05 12:55

Same Skill Collection

AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-artifact-evaluation/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-author-response/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-camera-ready/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-experiments/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-related-work/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-reproducibility/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-review-process/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-submission/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-supplementary/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-topic-selection/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-workflow/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-writing-style/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-artifact-evaluation/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-author-response/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-camera-ready/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-experiments/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-related-work/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-reproducibility/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-review-process/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-submission/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-supplementary/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-topic-selection/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-workflow/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-writing-style/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-editor-strategy/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-evidence-standards/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-literature-synthesis/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-organizing-framework/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-proposal-framing/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-review-process/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-revision/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-submission/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-tables-figures/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-topic-selection/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-workflow/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-writing-style/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-contribution-framing/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-data-analysis/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-literature-positioning/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-methods/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-rebuttal/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-review-process/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-submission/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-tables-figures/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-theory-development/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-topic-selection/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-workflow/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-writing-style/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Review-Skills/skills/amr-contribution-framing/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Review-Skills/skills/amr-data-analysis/SKILL.md

Metadata

Files
0
Version
9f86f09
Hash
6e8b93e5
Indexed
2026-07-05 12:55

Accueil - Wiki
Copyright © 2011-2026 iteam. Current version is 2.155.2. UTC+08:00, 2026-07-29 19:21
浙ICP备14020137号-1 $Carte des visiteurs$