commres-submission

GitHub

用于Communication Research期刊投稿前的最终预检,涵盖SAGE Track匿名化、45页限制、APA格式及数据声明等关键合规项核查。

Communication-Research-Skills/skills/commres-submission/SKILL.md brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

Trigger Scenarios

明天即将提交稿件 不确定SAGE Track所需的文件和元数据 确认页数限制、APA报告和匿名化是否合规

Install

npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill commres-submission -g -y
More Options

Non-standard path

npx skills add https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Communication-Research-Skills/skills/commres-submission -g -y

Use without installing

npx skills use brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills@commres-submission

指定 Agent (Claude Code)

npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill commres-submission -a claude-code -g -y

安装 repo 全部 skill

npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --all -g -y

预览 repo 内 skill

npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --list

SKILL.md

Frontmatter
{
    "name": "commres-submission",
    "description": "Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Communication Research (CR) via SAGE Track (ScholarOne) — double-anonymized preparation, the 45-page limit, APA reporting, the data-availability statement, ORCID, and declarations. Final checks; it does not draft content."
}

Submission Preflight (commres-submission)

The last check before pressing submit on SAGE Track (ScholarOne). CR is double-anonymized, so the single most common avoidable failure is an under-anonymized main document or supplement. Verify volatile specifics on the SAGE author page before relying on them.

When to trigger

  • "Submitting tomorrow" — last pass before upload
  • Unsure which files/metadata SAGE Track expects
  • Confirming the page limit, APA reporting, and anonymization are clean

Process facts (verify volatile items on the official page)

  • Publisher: SAGE Publishing. Founded 1974; bimonthly; ISSN 0093-6502 (print) / 1552-3810 (online).
  • Portal: SAGE Track (ScholarOne); author guidelines at journals.sagepub.com/author-instructions/crx (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准).
  • Review model: double-anonymized — anonymize the main document and supplemental materials; provide a separate title page. An initial evaluation precedes peer review; two independent reviews are required to back a Revise or Accept. Reviewers recommend to the Co-editors, who make the final decision.
  • Reviewer suggestions: the journal assigns reviewers and does not accept author recommendations — do not include a suggested-reviewer list.
  • Length: manuscript no more than 45 pages, double-spaced, inclusive of references; supplementary files do not count toward the page limit.
  • Abstract: unstructured, no more than 150 words, placed between title and main body; clinical-trial registration details (if applicable) go at the end of the abstract.
  • Special issues: CR does not publish special issues and does not work with guest editors.
  • Preprints: accepted as prior posting — supply the DOI at submission, and add the final-version link if accepted.
  • Style & reporting: APA; report statistics in line with APA — standard deviations and effect sizes where applicable; power analysis, confidence intervals for bootstrapping, and correlation matrices (as an online appendix) are encouraged where relevant.
  • Self-citations: written in the third person.
  • Transparency: data-availability statement expected; note any preregistration in the cover letter; deposit open-materials/data if claiming open practices; provide ORCID where requested.
  • Fee: no submission fee for the standard (subscription) route (verified 2026-06-22); an optional open-access APC applies only if you choose OA after acceptance — SAGE sets the amount on its live OA page (confirm before quoting).
  • Editors: final decisions rest with the Co-EditorsSilvia Knobloch-Westerwick (Ohio State) & Jennifer Gibbs (UC Santa Barbara) (verified 2026-06-22); editor roles rotate, so confirm the current masthead on the live SAGE page before naming them.

Preflight checklist

Format & length

  • Manuscript ≤ 45 pages, double-spaced, inclusive of references
  • Full specifications, scale items, robustness grids, codebooks moved to the online supplement
  • Abstract unstructured, ≤ 150 words, between title and main body; states question + design + tested mechanism + finding

Anonymity (double-anonymized)

  • No author names, affiliations, or acknowledgments in the main document
  • Supplemental materials also anonymized (no identifying links/paths)
  • Self-citations in the third person ("Smith and Lee (2024) showed…", not "as we showed…")
  • Identifying file metadata stripped (document properties, comments)
  • Separate (non-anonymous) title page with contact info + brief bio prepared as a distinct file

Reporting & metadata

  • APA formatting; statistics reported with SDs and effect sizes, CIs, df, exact p
  • Mediation reported with bootstrap CIs; moderated mediation with the index
  • Figures/tables self-contained, accessible (see commres-tables-figures)
  • ORCID provided where requested

Compliance & files

  • Ethics / IRB / human-subjects compliance stated
  • Data-availability statement included; preregistration noted in cover letter if applicable
  • Open-materials/data staged if claiming open practices (see commres-transparency-and-data)

Desk-reject and return-to-author patterns (avoidable before upload)

Trigger seen at intake Editor action Preflight fix
Author name in main doc or file properties returned for anonymity strip metadata; identity to the title page
Manuscript over 45 double-spaced pages (refs counted) returned for length move specs/scales/robustness to the supplement
Stars-only results, no effect sizes returned for APA reporting add d/η²ₚ/β + CIs; report SDs
Qualitative/descriptive submission declined without review re-route to a generalist/digital sibling, or add a tested mechanism
Abstract over 150 words or structured returned incomplete trim to ≤ 150 words, unstructured, between title and body
No data-availability statement flagged incomplete add the statement (repository + identifier, or exemption)

Calibration anchor: what "ready" means at CR (hedged)

A CR-ready submission clears three bars at once: a tested communication mechanism (not a bare effect), valid, reliably measured constructs an expert referee will trust, and APA-standard reporting with effect sizes and uncertainty. Volatile specifics — exact caps, APC, masthead, timelines — drift; confirm against the current SAGE author page (待核实).

Worked micro-example: a 5-minute anonymity sweep (illustrative)

Before upload, a survey-experiment manuscript runs the sweep: (1) search the main doc for the author surname — two first-person self-cites get rewritten in the third person; (2) an OSF link in the supplement resolving to a named project is swapped for a view-only anonymized link; (3) clear the author field in document properties; (4) confirm the scale items and CFA table sit in the supplement, not the main text, keeping the manuscript under 45 pages. All four would otherwise return the paper.

Anti-patterns

  • Leaving author identifiers in the text, supplements, or file metadata (breaks anonymization)
  • First-person self-references ("as we previously found") instead of third-person
  • Reporting significance without effect sizes (an APA-reporting failure at CR)
  • Manuscript over 45 double-spaced pages because supplements were not used
  • Omitting the data-availability statement

Output format

【Anonymized】main doc + supplements + file metadata clean? [Y/N]
【Self-citations third person】[Y/N]
【Length】≤ 45 double-spaced pp incl. references? [Y/N]
【APA reporting】effect sizes + CIs/SDs, mediation bootstrap CIs? [Y/N]
【Title page】separate non-anonymous file with bio + ORCID? [Y/N]
【Data-availability statement】included? [Y/N]
【Next】await decision → commres-rebuttal on R&R

Supplementary resources

Version History

  • 1839142 Current 2026-07-05 12:38

Same Skill Collection

AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-artifact-evaluation/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-author-response/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-camera-ready/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-experiments/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-related-work/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-reproducibility/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-review-process/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-submission/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-supplementary/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-topic-selection/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-workflow/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-writing-style/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-artifact-evaluation/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-author-response/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-camera-ready/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-experiments/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-related-work/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-reproducibility/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-review-process/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-submission/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-supplementary/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-topic-selection/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-workflow/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-writing-style/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-editor-strategy/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-evidence-standards/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-literature-synthesis/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-organizing-framework/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-proposal-framing/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-review-process/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-revision/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-submission/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-tables-figures/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-topic-selection/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-workflow/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-writing-style/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-contribution-framing/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-data-analysis/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-literature-positioning/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-methods/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-rebuttal/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-review-process/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-submission/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-tables-figures/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-theory-development/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-topic-selection/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-workflow/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-writing-style/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Review-Skills/skills/amr-contribution-framing/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Review-Skills/skills/amr-data-analysis/SKILL.md

Metadata

Files
0
Version
9f86f09
Hash
ac80e20d
Indexed
2026-07-05 12:38

Accueil - Wiki
Copyright © 2011-2026 iteam. Current version is 2.155.2. UTC+08:00, 2026-07-29 23:35
浙ICP备14020137号-1 $Carte des visiteurs$