jacs-scope-fit

GitHub

评估化学成果是否适合JACS或专业ACS期刊,通过新颖性和广度测试判断。提供文章与通讯格式选择建议及替代期刊推荐,明确不改进化学内容本身。

Journal-of-the-American-Chemical-Society-Skills/skills/jacs-scope-fit/SKILL.md brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

Trigger Scenarios

不确定是否应投JACS还是子领域期刊 需要验证‘JACS级别’声明的客观性 曾因缺乏普遍兴趣被拒稿 需早期决定投稿文章或通讯格式

Install

npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jacs-scope-fit -g -y
More Options

Non-standard path

npx skills add https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-the-American-Chemical-Society-Skills/skills/jacs-scope-fit -g -y

Use without installing

npx skills use brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills@jacs-scope-fit

指定 Agent (Claude Code)

npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jacs-scope-fit -a claude-code -g -y

安装 repo 全部 skill

npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --all -g -y

预览 repo 内 skill

npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --list

SKILL.md

Frontmatter
{
    "name": "jacs-scope-fit",
    "description": "Use when deciding whether a chemistry result belongs in the Journal of the American Chemical Society (JACS) versus a specialized ACS journal, and which JACS format fits. Judges fit and venue — it does not improve the chemistry itself."
}

Scope and Venue Fit (jacs-scope-fit)

When to trigger

  • You are unsure JACS is the right home versus a subfield ACS journal
  • A co-author says "this is JACS-level" and you want a sober test
  • An editor desk-rejected a prior version for "insufficient general interest"
  • You must choose Article vs Communication early

The JACS bar (broad interest + rigor)

JACS publishes a significant chemical advance of broad interest across chemistry, fully supported by data. Two tests must both pass:

  1. Advance test — Is the result genuinely new and important, not incremental? A new reaction/bond construction, a new mechanism or principle, a new material/property, a new method that others will adopt, or a problem long considered hard that you solved.
  2. Breadth test — Will chemists outside your immediate subfield care? Generality (scope), conceptual insight, or enabling utility are the usual sources of breadth.

If only the advance test passes but breadth is narrow, a specialized journal is the honest fit.

Venue decision table

Situation Likely better venue
Broad, general-interest advance, fully supported JACS (Article or Communication)
Solid methodology, mainly of interest within organic synthesis Org. Lett. / J. Org. Chem.
Coordination/main-group/bioinorganic, subfield interest Inorg. Chem.
Catalysis-focused, mechanism within catalysis community ACS Catal.
Materials synthesis/properties, materials audience Chem. Mater. / ACS Nano
Physical-chemistry measurement, PC audience J. Phys. Chem. family
Incremental scope extension of a known reaction Specialized journal, not JACS

Verify current sister-journal scopes on the ACS site; portfolios evolve.

Format fit (set expectations early)

  • Communication — a complete, urgent, high-impact advance that can stand on concise evidence (full proof lives in the SI). Choose when timeliness and a clean central result dominate.
  • Article — a full account with complete scope, controls, and mechanism. Choose when the story needs tables of scope, multiple mechanistic probes, or several characterized systems.
  • Confirm current article types and limits on the JACS author page; hand sizing to jacs-length-management.

Naming the breadth driver (be specific)

Editors triage on whether the manuscript itself argues breadth. Pick one primary driver and make the abstract carry it:

Breadth driver What must be in the data Example framing
Generality Scope spanning substrate classes others use daily; failures disclosed "…across ethers, amines, and three drug scaffolds"
Concept / mechanism A principle transferable beyond the system (new elementary step, selectivity model) "…establishes ligand-controlled distal selectivity as a design rule"
Enabling utility Something practitioners can now do (a disconnection, a probe, a material function) "…renders the C(sp³)–F disconnection strategic in route design"
Long-standing problem Documented prior failures by others; your data closing the gap "…solves the site-selectivity problem posed since [prior art]"

If you cannot fill the middle column from your own data, the driver is aspirational — either gather the missing evidence or pivot venue now, before writing.

Worked micro-example (same chemistry, two pitches)

  • Subfield pitch (belongs at Org. Lett.): "We extend Ni-catalyzed hydroamination to six new pyrazole nucleophiles in 61–88% yield."
  • JACS pitch (only if the data back it): "A single Ni catalyst couples any N–H heterocycle class we tested (5 azole families, 31 examples) with unactivated olefins, and kinetics reveal why: turnover-limiting olefin insertion is insensitive to azole pKa — a generality mechanism, not a scope accident."

The second pitch is honest only when the kinetics and the five-family scope exist. The scope-fit call is therefore a data audit, not a wording exercise.

Desk-rejection signals worth heeding

  • Your own abstract needs a subfield term (e.g., a niche ligand class) to state why the result matters — the breadth case has not been made.
  • The closest peer papers you can cite are all in specialized journals, none in JACS from the past few volumes.
  • The advance sentence begins "We extend / We also / We further" — extension language reads as incremental at a flagship venue.

Checklist

  • One sentence states the advance in terms a non-specialist chemist grasps
  • The breadth source is named (generality / concept / enabling utility)
  • At least two recent JACS papers in adjacent areas are identified as peers
  • An honest answer to "why not a specialized journal?" is written down
  • The intended format (Article vs Communication) is chosen with a reason
  • No claim of breadth that the data cannot support

Anti-patterns

  • Equating "lots of work" with "broad interest" — effort is not significance
  • "First example of X in our hands" framed as a field-wide first
  • Pitching an incremental substrate-scope paper as a conceptual advance
  • Choosing Communication when the central claim actually needs full Article-level support

Output format

【Advance】one-sentence statement of the new chemistry
【Breadth source】generality / concept / enabling utility
【Verdict】JACS-fit / better at <named ACS journal>
【Format】Article / Communication (+ reason)
【Next】jacs-results-framing (if JACS-fit) or pivot venue

Related resources

Version History

  • 1839142 Current 2026-07-05 14:00

Same Skill Collection

AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-artifact-evaluation/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-author-response/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-camera-ready/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-experiments/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-related-work/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-reproducibility/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-review-process/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-submission/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-supplementary/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-topic-selection/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-workflow/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-writing-style/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-artifact-evaluation/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-author-response/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-camera-ready/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-experiments/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-related-work/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-reproducibility/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-review-process/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-submission/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-supplementary/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-topic-selection/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-workflow/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-writing-style/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-editor-strategy/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-evidence-standards/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-literature-synthesis/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-organizing-framework/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-proposal-framing/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-review-process/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-revision/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-submission/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-tables-figures/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-topic-selection/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-workflow/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-writing-style/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-contribution-framing/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-data-analysis/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-literature-positioning/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-methods/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-rebuttal/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-review-process/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-submission/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-tables-figures/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-theory-development/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-topic-selection/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-workflow/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-writing-style/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Review-Skills/skills/amr-contribution-framing/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Review-Skills/skills/amr-data-analysis/SKILL.md

Metadata

Files
0
Version
9f86f09
Hash
88320ab1
Indexed
2026-07-05 14:00

Accueil - Wiki
Copyright © 2011-2026 iteam. Current version is 2.155.2. UTC+08:00, 2026-07-29 19:57
浙ICP备14020137号-1 $Carte des visiteurs$