jop-workflow

GitHub

JOP论文提交流程路由器,根据研究阶段和文章类型(长文/短文)将用户引导至对应子技能。强调以页数为约束并尽早准备可复现包,支持按症状快速路由,覆盖从选题到投稿及回复的全生命周期。

Journal-of-Politics-Skills/skills/jop-workflow/SKILL.md brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

Trigger Scenarios

开始撰写新的JOP论文,不确定从何入手 项目中途不确定下一步应使用哪个技能 需要在Research Article和Short Article之间做选择 收到审稿决定信,需要处理 rebuttal

Install

npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jop-workflow -g -y
More Options

Non-standard path

npx skills add https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Politics-Skills/skills/jop-workflow -g -y

Use without installing

npx skills use brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills@jop-workflow

指定 Agent (Claude Code)

npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jop-workflow -a claude-code -g -y

安装 repo 全部 skill

npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --all -g -y

预览 repo 内 skill

npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --list

SKILL.md

Frontmatter
{
    "name": "jop-workflow",
    "description": "Use as the entry point for any The Journal of Politics (JOP) manuscript. Routes to the right JOP sub-skill based on where you are in the lifecycle and whether a Research Article (<= 35 pages) or a Short Article (<= 10 pages) fits. JOP counts pages, not words, and makes acceptance contingent on replicability. It dispatches; it does not draft content."
}

JOP Workflow Router (jop-workflow)

The orchestrator for a JOP submission. Figure out the stage and the category, then send the user to the matching skill. JOP is a general-interest journal that counts pages, not words, and makes acceptance contingent on replicability — so the router's first jobs are to fix the category against the page budget and to start the replication package early.

When to trigger

  • Starting a new JOP paper and unsure where to begin
  • Mid-project and unsure which skill applies next
  • Deciding between a Research Article (≤ 35 pp) and a Short Article (≤ 10 pp)
  • Returning with a decision letter (route to jop-rebuttal)

First question: which category?

Situation Category Route to
Full original study, broad interest Research Article (≤ 35 pages) normal pipeline below
Single sharp contribution, fits tight Short Article (≤ 10 pages) normal pipeline, tighter scope
Lots of robustness / derivations / SI keep main text lean jop-tables-figures + Online Appendix (≤ 25 pp)
Empirical/formal results to deposit replication package jop-replication-and-data-policy early

JOP caps pages (double-spaced, 12-pt), not words. A paper that clears an APSR/AJPS word cap can still blow the 35-page budget — decide the category before you write.

Routing map (stage → skill)

Idea / fit?                      → jop-topic-selection
Where does it sit in the field?  → jop-literature-positioning
What's the argument?             → jop-theory-building
Is the design defensible?        → jop-research-design
Are the analyses sound?          → jop-data-analysis
Are the exhibits clear + lean?   → jop-tables-figures
Does it fit 35 / 10 pages?       → jop-writing-style
Repro package for the analyst?   → jop-replication-and-data-policy
How will it be judged?           → jop-review-process
Ready to submit?                 → jop-submission
Got an R&R / decision?           → jop-rebuttal

Default order

topic-selection → literature-positioning → theory-building → research-design → data-analysis → tables-figures → writing-style → replication-and-data-policy → review-process → submission → rebuttal

Iterate: most papers loop theory ↔ design ↔ analysis several times, and trim against the page budget before writing-style is done.

Anti-patterns

  • Planning by word count — JOP's binding constraint is pages
  • Padding a Short Article toward 35 pages instead of keeping one crisp contribution
  • Leaving the replication package until acceptance — a JOP replication analyst re-checks it
  • Dumping the whole paper into the Online Appendix to dodge the 35-page main-text budget

Triage by symptom (where the manuscript actually hurts)

When a paper is mid-flight, route by the loudest problem rather than the default order. These are the symptom-to-skill jumps a JOP author makes most often.

Symptom Likely real problem Jump to
"Feels specialist / incremental" Contribution not pitched general-interest jop-topic-selection, then jop-literature-positioning
"Reviewer doubts the causal claim" Identification or theory-test link jop-research-design
"Over the page budget" Exhibits, notes, or references too heavy jop-tables-figures, then jop-writing-style
"Worried about the analyst re-run" Package not reproducible jop-replication-and-data-policy

Referee pushback patterns and the JOP fix

  • "This reads like the wrong venue." Before polishing format, confirm the contribution is general-interest and not better suited to a sibling venue (APSR, AJPS, World Politics); reroute early, not at submission.
  • "The replication package is an afterthought." Start the package during analysis so the post-acceptance analyst check is routine; the router should trigger jop-replication-and-data-policy early, not last.

Router pass for Journal of Politics

Treat this skill as an executable review pass, not a prose hint. First lock the political mechanism, evidence design, and scope condition; then judge whether the current manuscript answers the venue's real reader: political-science reviewers who want theory, identification or formal logic, and generalizable political implications in balance.

  • Do the pass: Run the pack as a sequence: fit gate, evidence gate, writing gate, source-map gate, and final output contract; stop when a gate lacks evidence.
  • Return a ledger: give claim / evidence / risk / manuscript location rows, so the next agent can edit rather than rediscover the issue.
  • Sibling guard: compare against APSR for field-wide political science, AJPS for design-heavy empirical work, World Politics for comparative/international politics; if a sibling owns the contribution, recommend re-routing before polishing format.
  • Stop condition: do not give submission-ready advice until the pack's resources/official-source-map.md has been checked for volatile rules and the manuscript has one concrete fix for the largest venue-specific risk.

Output format

【Stage】idea / positioning / theory / design / analysis / exhibits / writing / replication / review / submit / rebut
【Category】Research Article (≤35 pp) / Short Article (≤10 pp)
【Route to】jop-<skill>
【Why】one line
【Then】the next skill after that

Supplementary resources

Version History

  • 1839142 Current 2026-07-05 13:54

Same Skill Collection

AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-artifact-evaluation/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-author-response/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-camera-ready/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-experiments/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-related-work/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-reproducibility/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-review-process/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-submission/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-supplementary/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-topic-selection/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-workflow/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-writing-style/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-artifact-evaluation/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-author-response/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-camera-ready/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-experiments/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-related-work/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-reproducibility/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-review-process/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-submission/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-supplementary/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-topic-selection/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-workflow/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-writing-style/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-editor-strategy/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-evidence-standards/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-literature-synthesis/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-organizing-framework/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-proposal-framing/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-review-process/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-revision/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-submission/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-tables-figures/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-topic-selection/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-workflow/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-writing-style/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-contribution-framing/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-data-analysis/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-literature-positioning/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-methods/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-rebuttal/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-review-process/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-submission/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-tables-figures/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-theory-development/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-topic-selection/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-workflow/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-writing-style/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Review-Skills/skills/amr-contribution-framing/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Review-Skills/skills/amr-data-analysis/SKILL.md

Metadata

Files
0
Version
9f86f09
Hash
6d18d3d8
Indexed
2026-07-05 13:54

Accueil - Wiki
Copyright © 2011-2026 iteam. Current version is 2.155.2. UTC+08:00, 2026-07-29 23:38
浙ICP备14020137号-1 $Carte des visiteurs$