Brainstorm

This skill explores a game concept through open-ended designer interview. Spawn gat-designer for design reasoning and gat-artist for visual direction. Pick questions from the angle table below — follow the conversation, not a script.

Phase 1: Resolve Mode

• If argument is discuss → Mode: discuss (no files written, exploration only)
• If argument is a hint or empty → Mode: design (produces foundational design docs and global art direction)

Check whether gat/overview/game.md, gat/overview/systems-index.md, or gat/overview/art-direction.md already exist. If so, note them — the interview may refine or replace existing decisions instead of starting from scratch.

Phase 2: The Interview

Core Rules

• One question at a time. Never batch. Wait for the answer before the next question.
• Provide a recommended answer with each question. Explain the design reasoning.
• Prefer open-ended questions. Let the user type free-form responses. Reserve AskUserQuestion (multiple-choice) for when you are presenting concrete solution options and need the user to pick one. Most of the interview should be dialogue, not forms.
• Pick angles, don't follow steps. Use the angle table as a menu. Jump to whatever dimension is most useful next — chase what's interesting or ambiguous.
• If a question can be answered by reading existing design files, read them instead of asking.
• Spawn gat-designer when you need a design reasoning pass: drafting a core loop, proposing systems, evaluating a trade-off, or checking consistency.
• Spawn gat-artist when visual identity needs synthesis: art references, palette, readability, asset groups, production standards, or conflicts between style and gameplay clarity.

Drilling into Vague Ideas

When the user has a fuzzy idea — about the whole game or a single system — your job is to make it concrete through relentless, curious questioning. This is the core of the interview.

How to drill:

• When the user says something vague ("combat should feel impactful"), ask what specifically makes it impactful — is it animation, sound, damage numbers, controller rumble, enemy reaction, time-to-kill? Keep asking until the abstraction bottoms out in concrete mechanics.
• When the user proposes a system, ask about its boundaries. What does it NOT do? What system owns the adjacent responsibility? A system without edges is still fuzzy.
• When the user describes a player experience ("I want the player to feel lost"), ask what the game does to create that feeling. What does the player see, hear, and do? What information is withheld? What mechanics produce the emotion?
• When the user references another game ("like Dark Souls but..."), isolate what exactly they want to keep and what they want to change. The reference is a shortcut — unpack it.
• Ask about edge cases and failure states. What happens when the player ignores the system? What happens when they optimize it to the extreme? The answers reveal whether the system is understood or still hazy.
• Ask about the player's moment-to-moment decisions. If the user can't describe what choices the player makes inside the system, the system isn't clear yet.
• If an answer opens three new questions, pick the most foundational one first. Resolve dependencies before details.

Signals that something is still vague and needs more drilling:

• The user uses abstract adjectives without mechanics behind them ("fun", "smooth", "deep", "cool")
• A system is named but its inputs, outputs, and rules are undefined
• Two systems have overlapping or unclear boundaries
• The user can describe what the system IS but not what the player DOES in it
• Numbers are absent where they matter (how many? how long? how much?)

Seed Extraction

If a concept hint was provided, first spawn gat-designer to extract what the hint already answers. Briefly summarize what's established so the user can confirm or correct before diving in. Skip if no hint.

Interview Angles

Pick questions from any angle below. There is no fixed order — follow the thread that matters most at each moment. The table is a palette, not a checklist.

Navigating the Interview

• Start where the energy is. If the user leads with a mechanic, start at Systems. If they describe a feeling, start at Target Feeling. If they mention a reference game, start at Genre & Style.
• Drill, don't move on. When the user gives a vague or high-level answer, stay on that thread. Ask the follow-up that forces them to be specific. See "Drilling into Vague Ideas" above — this is where most of the value comes from.
• Dive when something is interesting. A throwaway answer about "the world is post-apocalyptic" might open a rich thread about Narrative & World, Economy (scarcity), or Fantasy & Role. Follow it.
• Ask open-ended, resolve with options. Most questions should be free-form dialogue — the user types their thoughts. Use AskUserQuestion only when you have 2-3 concrete design proposals and need the user to choose among them (e.g. picking a core loop direction, choosing between two system architectures).
• Spawn gat-designer mid-interview when you need to synthesize answers into a concrete proposal (core loop draft, system list, trade-off analysis). Present what the agent returns, then ask about it.
• Spawn gat-artist mid-interview when the visual identity is too vague or conflicting. Ask for a concise art-direction proposal: references, palette, shape language, readability priorities, asset groups, and production limits. Present the proposal, then ask the user what to keep or change.
• Loop back naturally. If a later answer contradicts an earlier assumption, point it out and resolve the tension. Don't pretend consistency exists when it doesn't.
• Know when to stop. The interview has covered enough when:
  • The core loop is clear and the user can describe it in their own words
  • The system list is named with rough dependencies
  • The global visual direction has references, palette or mood, readability priorities, and asset group strategy
  • Scope boundaries are set
  • The user starts repeating themselves rather than adding new information

Phase 3: Write or Summarize

If Mode is design

Before writing, summarize what's been decided across gameplay, systems, scope, and visual direction. Ask:

"Ready to write the design docs?" Options: Yes, write them / Let me keep discussing

If yes, read templates:

• .claude/docs/templates/design/game-overview.md
• .claude/docs/templates/design/systems-index.md
• .claude/docs/templates/design/global-art.md

Step 1 — Spawn gat-designer to write both foundational design files in one pass:

• gat/overview/game.md
• gat/overview/systems-index.md

Pass all interview answers, the confirmed system list with dependencies, and the game overview and systems index templates.

Instruct the designer to populate the Key Design Decisions section in game.md: record each foundational choice as a short paragraph, and add a Why: note when the rationale or rejected alternatives need to be stated — drawing from the interview's tension-resolution moments.

Step 2 — Spawn gat-artist to write the global art direction:

• gat/overview/art-direction.md

Pass all interview answers, gat/overview/game.md, gat/overview/systems-index.md, the confirmed visual identity decisions, and the global-art template. The artist should establish the shared visual identity, references, palette, readability rules, asset groups, production standards, and constraints for later system art docs.

If Mode is discuss

Summarize what was decided and what remains open. No files written.

Suggest:

• /gat-brainstorm (without discuss) to turn this discussion into foundational design docs and global art direction
• /gat-story if the game needs narrative (after foundational design docs exist)
• /gat-milestone to plan milestone slices (after foundational design docs, and narrative if needed, exist)

Phase 4: Hand Off

Summarize what was created or discussed.

If design docs were written, suggest next steps:

• /gat-story if the game needs story, lore, worldbuilding, characters, quests, dialogue, or authored narrative content
• /gat-milestone to break the game into milestone slices (milestone planning runs BEFORE per-system design; do NOT run /gat-design directly from here)