gec-topic-selection

GitHub

辅助评估环境变化项目是否符合GEC期刊标准,重点考察社会科学与政策相关性。提供选题压力测试、四大契合度指标、主题框架及文章格式建议,帮助作者规避纯自然科学或描述性内容的误区。

Global-Environmental-Change-Skills/skills/gec-topic-selection/SKILL.md brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

Trigger Scenarios

为GEC投稿选择或调整项目框架 审稿人指出论文缺乏社会科学贡献 决定撰写Research Article还是Perspective

Install

npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill gec-topic-selection -g -y
More Options

Non-standard path

npx skills add https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Global-Environmental-Change-Skills/skills/gec-topic-selection -g -y

Use without installing

npx skills use brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills@gec-topic-selection

指定 Agent (Claude Code)

npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill gec-topic-selection -a claude-code -g -y

安装 repo 全部 skill

npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --all -g -y

预览 repo 内 skill

npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --list

SKILL.md

Frontmatter
{
    "name": "gec-topic-selection",
    "description": "Use when deciding whether an environmental-change project fits Global Environmental Change (GEC) and how to frame it. GEC publishes the human and policy dimensions of global environmental change and requires a significant social-science component, so the test is societal significance and policy relevance, not an environmental result alone. Helps frame the question; it does not collect data."
}

Topic Selection & Fit (gec-topic-selection)

GEC is the leading journal on the human and policy dimensions of global environmental change. The bar is not "an interesting environmental finding" — it is "advances knowledge about how societies drive, experience, and respond to environmental change." Use this skill to pressure-test fit before you invest.

When to trigger

  • Choosing among possible projects or framings for a GEC submission
  • A reviewer/colleague said the paper feels "too natural-science" or "no social-science contribution"
  • Deciding between a full Research Article and a shorter Perspective
  • Checking that the work speaks to multiple scales (local processes, global consequences)

The GEC fit test

A strong GEC paper usually clears all four:

  1. A significant social-science component. The paper must illuminate the social drivers or consequences of environmental change, or the social, governance, and policy processes that address it — not a biophysical result with a policy sentence attached.
  2. Societal / policy significance. A reader outside your discipline should see why it matters for how societies adapt, govern, distribute risk, or transition. State the stakes.
  3. A genuine contribution. It changes how the field frames, measures, or governs a problem — a new conceptual framework, a decisive empirical test, a reconceptualization, or an evidence base for action.
  4. Multi-scale framing. GEC reads global environmental change as manifest in localities with consequences across spatial, temporal, and socio-political scales — connect your case to that.

Theme framing (lead with the human dimension)

Theme Reach GEC's audience by…
Climate adaptation / vulnerability tie exposure to social vulnerability, capacity, and equity, not hazard alone
Environmental governance draw the general governance mechanism, not just one institution's story
Sustainability transitions connect socio-technical change to actors, power, and policy levers
Food / water / land / oceans frame as a coupled human-environment system, not a resource study
Behavior / values link individual behavior to drivers, scale, and policy design

Format choice

  • Research Article — full study, broad claim, up to 8,000 words; review-style pieces belong here only when they add new insight beyond summarizing the literature.
  • Perspective — a distinctive, agenda-setting viewpoint, up to 3,000 words; argument-led and not the right format for papers requiring methods/data-analysis description.

Anti-patterns

  • An environmental / biophysical result with no social-science contribution (off-fit)
  • "It has not been studied in country X" as the whole contribution (descriptive, local-only)
  • A method demonstration with no human-dimensions or policy payoff
  • A sprawling question that cannot be answered convincingly within the length cap

Output format

【Question】one sentence
【Human / policy dimension】the social drivers, consequences, or governance processes at stake
【Societal significance】who outside the subfield cares, and why
【Contribution type】framework / test / measurement / reconceptualization / evidence-for-action
【Format】Research Article / Perspective / other
【Fit verdict】strong / needs reframing / off-fit (why)
【Next】gec-literature-positioning

Supplementary resources

Version History

  • 1839142 Current 2026-07-05 13:17

Same Skill Collection

AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-artifact-evaluation/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-author-response/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-camera-ready/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-experiments/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-related-work/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-reproducibility/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-review-process/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-submission/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-supplementary/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-topic-selection/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-workflow/SKILL.md
AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-writing-style/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-artifact-evaluation/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-author-response/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-camera-ready/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-experiments/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-related-work/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-reproducibility/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-review-process/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-submission/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-supplementary/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-topic-selection/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-workflow/SKILL.md
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-writing-style/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-editor-strategy/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-evidence-standards/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-literature-synthesis/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-organizing-framework/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-proposal-framing/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-review-process/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-revision/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-submission/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-tables-figures/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-topic-selection/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-workflow/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-writing-style/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-contribution-framing/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-data-analysis/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-literature-positioning/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-methods/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-rebuttal/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-review-process/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-submission/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-tables-figures/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-theory-development/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-topic-selection/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-workflow/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-writing-style/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Review-Skills/skills/amr-contribution-framing/SKILL.md
Academy-of-Management-Review-Skills/skills/amr-data-analysis/SKILL.md

Metadata

Files
0
Version
9f86f09
Hash
6d405674
Indexed
2026-07-05 13:17

Accueil - Wiki
Copyright © 2011-2026 iteam. Current version is 2.155.2. UTC+08:00, 2026-07-30 00:16
浙ICP备14020137号-1 $Carte des visiteurs$