System Health Check

Perform a comprehensive health assessment of the user's Hyper Alpha Arena setup. Evaluate all components and provide an overall health score with actionable recommendations.

Workflow

Phase 0: Foundation Check (Environment & Watchlist)

Before checking components, verify the system foundation:

1. Trading Environment: Use get_trading_environment()

   • Confirm current mode (testnet/mainnet)
   • Remind user this affects all operations

2. Watchlist Configuration: Use get_watchlist()

   • Check if user is still using default watchlist (only BTC)
   • If yes, flag as Warning: "Using default watchlist — only BTC data is being collected"
   • List symbols currently being monitored for each exchange
   • Check if any signal pools reference symbols NOT in the watchlist

→ [CHECKPOINT] Report environment and watchlist status. Flag warnings if using defaults.

Phase 1: System Overview

Gather baseline data using get_system_overview:

• Total AI Traders count and their enabled/disabled status
• LLM configuration status (provider, model)
• Wallet binding status and balances
• Strategy binding overview (Prompt and Program counts)
• Signal pool status and active count

Present a quick summary table of component status.

→ [CHECKPOINT] Show system overview. Ask if user wants detailed checks.

Phase 2: Runtime Status Check

Check active components:

• Use list_traders to inspect each trader:
  • Is trading enabled?
  • When was the last trigger (last_trigger_at)?
  • Are there any stuck traders (enabled but no recent triggers)?
• Check Program Bindings activation status
• Check signal pool recent trigger history
• Verify wallet balances are sufficient for trading

Flag any anomalies:

• Traders enabled but not triggering for >24 hours
• Signal pools with no recent signals
• Wallets with zero or very low balance
• Program bindings that are inactive

→ [CHECKPOINT] Present runtime status with health indicators.

Phase 3: Error Log Analysis (Exchange-Aware)

Use get_system_logs to check for recent errors. The response now includes:

• severity_summary: counts of CRITICAL/WARNING/INFO/NOISE errors
• user_exchange: detected exchange (hyperliquid/binance/null)
• registry on each log: severity, exchange tag, affected subsystem, suggestion

Filtering rules:

1. Ignore NOISE errors entirely — they are transient/harmless
2. Deprioritize other_exchange errors — if a log's registry.relevance is other_exchange, it means the error is from an exchange the user doesn't use. Mention it only in passing (e.g., "also saw 3 Hyperliquid errors but you use Binance — not relevant to you")
3. Focus on CRITICAL errors for user's active exchange — these block trading
4. Report WARNING errors for user's exchange as secondary concerns
5. Use registry suggestions to provide actionable guidance

Severity categories:

• CRITICAL: Prevents trading (API down, insufficient balance, invalid keys)
• WARNING: Degraded functionality (stale data, parse errors, WS disconnects)
• INFO: Normal operations (price snapshots, HOLD decisions, notifications)
• NOISE: Scheduler overlaps, deprecation warnings, connection resets

→ [CHECKPOINT] Present overall health assessment:

• Health score (Healthy / Needs Attention / Critical)
• Summary of issues found, filtered by user's exchange
• Prioritized list of recommended actions with registry suggestions
• Offer to help fix any issues found

Key Rules

• Always use tool calls for real data — never fabricate status
• Present results in a clear, non-technical format
• Prioritize actionable recommendations
• If everything is healthy, confirm it clearly
• For critical issues, offer to run trader-diagnosis skill