tlc-implement
GitHub将已审批计划或需求冻结为检查项,通过构建并独立验证器证明每个检查,确保交付物符合规范。
Trigger Scenarios
Install
npx skills add tech-leads-club/agent-skills --skill tlc-implement -g -y
SKILL.md
Frontmatter
{
"name": "tlc-implement",
"license": "CC-BY-4.0",
"metadata": {
"author": "Tech Leads Club - github.com\/tech-leads-club",
"version": "1.2.0"
},
"description": "Implements work already planned - a plan.md from tlc-plan, or a small ticket - by freezing it into checks with proofs, building, and proving every check with a script and an independent Verifier before declaring done. Use when the user says \"implement this plan\", \"build this ticket\", \"implement this spec\", \"write the checks\", \"verify work\", or \"tlc-implement\". Do NOT use when nobody has decided what to build, or to plan a feature that needs one (that is tlc-plan)."
}
TLC Implement
Freeze the obligations. Free the build. Prove it with someone who did not build it.
┌────────┐ ┌───────┐ ┌────────┐
│ CHECKS │ → │ BUILD │ → │ VERIFY │
└────────┘ └───────┘ └────────┘
obligations yours always
The common failure of a coding agent is a requirement that never became an active obligation, followed by a completion claim. What works against it is a small, frozen, external obligation set and a verifier that is not the author, so the budget goes there and not into choreographing the model. How you build is yours.
The input is an approved .specs/features/<feature>/plan.md from tlc-plan - approved means
its **Approved**: <date> - user: "<their words>" line, which validate_checks.py requires - and
it is the whole brief: you may have none of the conversation that produced it. A change under roughly three
files with no one-way door needs no plan: write checks.md with an ## Intent paragraph instead.
Anything larger with no plan, or a plan with an open blocks question, goes back to tlc-plan.
Rules
These hold even if no reference file is read. Each one lives here; the references point back.
- Every check is one observable claim with a concrete value plus the proof that settles it: a test or command whose exit code decides, or, for a state a capture draws, a picture of it judged against the capture (rule 9).
- Tests assert what the checks say, not what the code happens to do. Do not write a test by reading the implementation.
- A test changes only with the claim it proves, and leaves with the code it proves, in the same commit. Changing a test to make a suite pass hides the failure it exists to show: a wrong check is a stop-and-ask.
- Checks are fixed once
validate_checks.pypasses; a check may be appended when the walk or the Verifier finds a missing obligation. In the plan,Landing,Surfaceand the stored shape are additive; the path andChanges underneathare kept true in the commit that changes them. - The Verifier is a fresh sub-agent, never the author, and it always runs, once per feature,
beside the screens sub-agent.
check_proofs.pysettles the mechanical part - every proof run and passing atHEAD, the build, the pictures, the walk - and the Verifier spends its time on judgement: it opens the test each check's proof selects and says whether that test would fail if the claim were false, then tries examples nobody named and assertions looser than their criterion. The work is done when every finding is closed by a commit andproofs.mdis green atHEAD. - A proof is the project's own test command; the skill knows no test runner. Tests that run
together go on one
Run <name>: <command>line, run once, and each check that reads it writesProof: run <name> | <the line the run prints when its test passes>, pass marker included, so a filter that selects nothing readsno test raninstead of a green exit code. A command run alone is judged by its exit code. The checks are the floor; an edge case or guard no check names is still the work. - The completion gate is a script:
validate_verification.pyexits 0. The final report opens with its last line; a red gate is said first, never left for the reader to find. - An approved plan authorizes local edits and local commits.
git push, deploy and production data changes need an explicit go-ahead for that action. - A state a capture draws is one picture. The author reaches that state and saves
<capture>.running.pngbeside the capture from a browser window at the capture's size - its pixel size over its scale: a wider window lays the page out differently, and resizing the image afterwards hides it. Nobody reopens the app to judge it: a screens sub-agent judges the file (verify-screens.md), and a picture whose text reads smaller than the capture's was resized and is retaken. It matches the capture except for what## Differences from the sourcelists. A state no capture draws, and an existing screen the feature does not change, are proven by a test or awalkproof, with no picture and no judge. - A capture, frame or live site the plan cites as binding is changed only by the user. Removing,
renaming or departing from something it draws is asked, recorded as a decision in
.specs/STATE.md, and listed in the plan's## Differences from the sourcewithConfirmed: y - AD-NNN. - The files hold the run; the chat does not survive a compaction. What the user settles while
you build goes on
checks.md's**Settled mid-build:**line in the turn they say it. Each sub-agent goes on the**Dispatched:**line before it is sent. After a compaction or in a new session, re-read this file and the current phase's reference, then resume from the files (memory.md).
Who checks what
| Part | Runs | Cannot catch |
|---|---|---|
check_proofs.py (always) |
every Run group and lone proof once at HEAD, one at a time, each check's line found in its run's output, the build, pictures and walk checked |
a test that passes for the wrong reason |
| The Verifier (always) | each check's test read against its criterion, two examples nobody named, assertions looser than their criterion, checks that contradict a binding capture (verify.md) | a wrong rule whose test reads as right |
| The screens sub-agent (a criterion cites a capture) | an inventory of each capture against the author's picture, every row same or differs, at a named HEAD (verify-screens.md) |
spacing, colour and type weight; detail smaller than a screenshot shows; screens no capture draws |
Artifacts
.specs/
├── STATE.md # decisions log (AD-NNN)
├── LESSONS.md # rendered by scripts/lessons.py - do not hand-edit
├── lessons.json # machine-owned
└── features/<feature>/
├── plan.md # from tlc-plan; read, and kept true
├── checks.md # claims + proofs, the coverage join, swept, handoff
├── captures/ # binding source files, and the author's <capture>.running.png
├── screens.md # the screens sub-agent's inventory and verdict, per picture
├── proofs.md # written by check_proofs.py: every proof at HEAD, and each run's output
└── verification.md # the Verifier's judgement of each check, and its findings closed by commits
Phases
| Phase | What it produces | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Checks | claims with proofs, every set joined member by member, the nine dimensions swept | checks.md |
| Build | tests from the checks, the code, commits, the screens walked and saved | build.md |
| Verify | rule 5 | verify.md, verify-screens.md |
Decisions, resuming and lessons: memory.md.
Scripts
Resolve <skill-dir> as the directory containing this SKILL.md and run
python3 <skill-dir>/scripts/<name>.py. Pass --root when cwd is not the project root. A non-zero
exit means stop and fix. Run a script rather than read it: its messages say what to change. On
Windows, where python3 may be the Microsoft Store alias, run python or py -3.
| When | Command |
|---|---|
| Before starting to build | validate_checks.py <feature> --execute - it also requires the plan's **Approved**: line, and runs the Build: line once: red before any change stops |
| Before each commit | check_commit.py --message "<msg>" - it also prints what follows the last commit |
| Before dispatching the Verifier, and after the fix | check_proofs.py <feature> |
| Before declaring done | validate_verification.py <feature> |
| Before writing checks, and after the gate | lessons.py ... |
| After editing a validator or template | selftest.py |
selftest.py mutates the fixtures in scripts/fixtures/ once per gate rule and requires every
mutant to be killed; the fixtures are also a worked example of a passing artifact set.
Requires
| Needs | For | Without it |
|---|---|---|
| Python 3.8+ (standard library only) | every script | the gates do not run; the phases still apply |
| git | check_proofs.py (HEAD, clean tree) |
no HEAD check: say so in the report |
| Git for Windows (on Windows) | check_proofs.py runs proofs in its bash, because proofs are POSIX shell |
proofs run in cmd.exe and the script warns |
| sub-agents | the Verifier and the screens sub-agent | run their file in a new session and write self-verified; the gate warns |
| a model that reads images | the screens sub-agent | hand the pictures and the captures to the user |
| a browser the agent can drive | saving <capture>.running.png and the walk |
hand the steps to the user |
Test runners: none is built in. check_proofs.py runs the commands checks.md names as the
project runs them, one at a time, with no timeout; a run's own parallelism is whatever the project
configured (checks.md).
Output
Produce the artifact; do not narrate the phase. Lead with the verdict and state decisions plainly. Section headings stay in English; prose follows the project; identifiers are never translated.
Version History
-
5929de5
Current 2026-11-03 00:42
移除内置测试运行器和变异测试逻辑,改为使用项目原生测试命令生成证明;新增构建前校验门禁及提交后未验证项检查脚本。
- 120b676 2026-09-22 12:56


